Monthly Archive for May, 2007

Searching for an urban jungle

On a bitter, rainy day last March, I began dreaming of spring and became desperate to get out of the house. I had all three kids: Alex and Jon, then 16 months, and Thomas, two-and-a-half. Where could we go to burn off toddler energy and get a much-needed change of scenery? I decided to try one of the indoor “adventure playlands” on the outskirts of our city. I had never been, but had heard from other parents that it was safe, children loved it, and that I could probably just relax as the kids explored tunnels, climbed the jungle gyms, and slid into pits of balls.

Apparently, every parent in the city had the same idea that day. There must have been forty thousand kids in that playland, all running, yelling and jumping. I was overwhelmed. Thomas and the twins were overwhelmed. I scurried around like a complete obsessive, trying to track the three of them. Thomas still got lost – twice. I found him crying face-down on the carpet. Alex and Jon could negotiate the ramps, tunnels and slides, but really, really hated the ball pits where all ramps, tunnels and slides seemed to end. I couldn’t blame them. The pits were alive with kicking, flailing toddler limbs, and were very difficult to exit.

After an hour or so, I corralled the boys back into the stroller. They were exhausted and not unhappy to be leaving. I was a mess, and thrilled to be out of there.

This never-to-be-repeated experience coincided, ironically, with my discovery of Last Child in the Woods, a book by Richard Louv. The subtitle of the book is Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Louv describes how kids are becoming dissociated from everything wild and green. Play is moving indoors or into bordered areas and structured activities where it can be constantly monitored for safety. Some schools are even shortening recess in favour of more “productive” time inside. Louv objects to this trend and so do I. The book is at once compelling, alarming and obvious. It is part of a growing literature and movement toward environmental education, schoolyard greening, and more unstructured play for kids.

I do, however, have three words to add to this conversation:
Winter.
Toddlers.
Multiples.

I would love for my kids to enthusiastically explore the outdoors. While I wouldn’t set any toddler free in a forest or vacant urban lot, I agree with Louv that even very young children benefit from being outside, free to roam, touch, fall down and get up again. The problem with having three kids under three years old, is that they tend to roam in three different directions. It’s almost impossible for one adult to take three toddlers to an unenclosed area, safely.

Thomas is almost 32 months old now. He knows to stop at street corners, to stay on the sidewalk, and to turn around when I say so. But I wouldn’t bet his life on him following directions while I run after his younger brothers. I know a nanny who cares for toddler twins and refuses to leave the house at all. It seems extreme, but toddlers get restless in a stroller and are very hard to herd when they’re on the loose.

Even with two adults, it can be challenging to keep track of three young children. We recently took our kids to a nearby farm. They loved it, but the day was not without minor trauma. Jon fell head-first off the bunny observation stool; Thomas lathered himself in fresh cow dung; Alex massaged his gums on the animal enclosures. All of this happened while we were trying to prevent a similar or worse event.

I am hoping that outdoor adventure, summer and winter, will get easier as the kids get older. Last year, the twins were immobilized by their snow gear, and even Thomas was frustrated by cumbersome mittens. (It’s surprisingly hard to get toddlers’ thumbs into the right section of the mitt, and trying to play without an opposable thumb inevitably leads to tears.) I have not-too-distant plans to teach them to skate, ski and build snow caves. I hope to take Thomas camping this summer, and get all three kids into the backcountry before long.

For now, I am limited by the number of available hands, and our urban location. Limited, but not incapacitated. We’re lucky enough to have a fenced-in backyard where the kids can play almost independently. I am teaching them about the garden. Thomas has helped to plant seeds and transplant seedlings, and he knows where to find berries and bugs.* We have a bird feeder. Alex often asks to see the “boods”, and Thomas can recognise chickadees and cardinals. And, often to my own, short-term, detriment, I don’t discourage them from splashing in puddles, playing in the dirt or feeding the garden ants. It’s not wilderness, but for now, it’s wild enough for me.

*An inspiring book for gardening with kids is Roots, Shoots, Buckets and Boots by Sharon Lovejoy.

Sleeping through the night. Part 3: Alex

Alex. Charming, smart, beautiful, willful, volatile. Able to wake the whole house in a single shriek.

It has been about a month since we decided to ferberize Alex. The short and unexpected story is that he still wakes several times night while Jon, with no intervention on our part, sleeps soundly from evening until morning.

Here’s the longer story.

I decided to re-read parts of Ferber’s book before withholding Alex’s nighttime milk supply, and letting him, and us, cope with the consequences. Ferberizing has such a bad reputation, but some of his advice is quite reasonable, even moderate. For children like Alex, who drink several bottles or nurse several times a night, Ferber suggests that cold-turkey is too radical. Rather, the amount of milk in the bottle, or the time spent nursing should be reduced gradually over the course of a week or two. He maintains that too much milk interferes with sound sleep, and therefore if babies drink less throughout the night, they will start to sleep better and longer.

Alex is quite particular. We usually give him a warm, five-ounce bottle at night. If his bottle is cold, or half-full, or, god forbid, contains water, it gets thrown with complete contempt to the other end of the crib. He’s not spoiled, at least not during the day. He listens to “no”, he waits, he is learning to share. Anything to do with sleep, however, seems to bring out his worst, or perhaps his most insecure. Nonetheless, we decided to try Ferber’s approach.

We cut his milk to four ounces the first night. The bottle was drunk, not thrown. So far, so good. After another two nights, we gave him only three ounces. Miraculously, he didn’t balk. In fact, after several nights at three ounces, he slept for six straight hours and consumed only three ounces during the entire night. That’s twelve ounces less than his usual nighttime fare. We were making progress.

Life intervened. After giving Alex slightly less than three ounces one evening, I went to bed, expecting all to be quiet. Instead, he started to cry. Not his I-want-more-milk cry, but a deeper and more urgent cry. He had thrown up all three ounces and more. He was clearly ill for only 24 hours, but he was more subtly distressed – clingy and irritable – for about ten days. I couldn’t add to his misery by further reducing his nightly comfort food. I did try watering down his milk, another of Ferber’s suggestions. Alex took one sip of his homemade skim milk and the bottle went flying…. So here we are. He still wakes up twice a night on average – sometimes only once, sometimes three times. He still gets, and gulps, three ounces each time.

Now that Alex is well and my husband is home (he was away on business during the events of the last paragraph) we will continue to wean Alex from his nocturnal milk dependency. I doubt that it will be easy. Although he is drinking less at night, he still relies on a bottle to go back to sleep. Three ounces to zero will be a big step.

Luckily, thankfully, Jon has decided not only to sleep in his crib, but to sleep through the entire night. We didn’t force it, or even plan it. The only explanations I have are: (1) Jon has a calmer, more even temper than Alex; (2) Jon finishes all of Alex’s food and bottles during the day; and (3) he’s seventeen months old. Really, it has to happen sometime.